 |
Craps: Field Bet vs. Inside Bets
| Online
Casino :
Craps: Field Bet vs. Inside Bets
|
| |
Previous
Page
Next
Page
What's better placing a Field bet or a bunch of inside
bets? Craps expert Frank Scoblete explains
by Frank
Scoblete
I recently received a letter from a craps player touting his 'simple' method
of play. "I bet the Field, you have seven of the 11 numbers. And you have 16
ways to hit those seven numbers."
He's right, as far as he goes. In fact, the Field is even better than he said
it was because on two of those numbers, the 2 and 12, the player gets paid off
at two to one. So he actually wins $18 when those seven numbers hit if he's
betting $1 a pop on them. Of course, he loses $20. If we consider a 'cycle'
to be the complete win/loss on every number, then the house is a $2 winner for
every "cycle" of 36 rolls, an approximately 5.6 percent house edge.
You can also have 18 wins if you place the 6 and 8, 5 and 9, as these numbers,
combined, will come up 18 times. Is placing the 'inside numbers' a better bet
than the Field? Well, let's see.
If you bet $22 inside, which is $6 each on the 6 and 8, and $5 each on the 5
and 9, you will win 18 decisions for a win of $126, since you get paid $7 for
every win. However, when the 7 rears any of its ugly face combinations, you
will lose all $22 and that will happen six times in a 36 roll cycle for a loss
of $132. You're a net loser of $6. This is an approximately 2.6 percent house
edge.
Based strictly on house edge, placing the inside numbers appears to
be the better bet. But is it actually the better bet in the real world? Yes
and no.
If you are a player who can easily afford placing the inside numbers, then avoid
the field bet. Why give the casino more than twice the edge on you? However,
if you are really on an extremely limited budget, then you can make the Field
bet for a mere $1 at most casinos. Granted you'll be in on every roll as the
Field is decided each and every time the dice are thrown, approximately 120
decisions per hour. So you will wager $120, have the 5.6 percent house edge
cut into it to the tune of almost $7 per hour.
And what of our place bettor? In 120 rolls of the dice, the 'inside betting'
strategy will see a decision two-thirds of the time, that's 80 decisions, that's
$1760 wagered, with the house keeping approximately $46.
So if you are extremely short on cash, then you can just keep betting the Field,
but once you can afford, and actually start, to make bets that come in with
lower house edges, you abandon the Field in favor of those bets.
There is one caveat to the above advice. Some casinos in their infinite generosity
will pay triple on the 2 or 12 Field bet. That lowers the house edge to 2.7
percent on the Field bet. Now that becomes just about as good a bet as the placing
of the "inside numbers" in terms of the house edge.
Are there betting systems that can overcome the Field edges? No, there aren't.
But some players like to play around with raising or lowering their bets, in
the hopes of riding a streak.
One of the best methods for making a profit in a streak on the Field is the
'Four-Step' which is to place the field for X amount and when it hits, just
let everything ride. On the second hit, take your win. On the third hit, let
it ride again. On the fourth hit, take everything down to its initial bet. So
you bet 1 unit, then 2, (win and keep 2) then 2, then 4, (win, then take the
4-unit win and bring your bet down to 1-unit, keeping the additional 3 units).
In this four-win sequence, you have won a total of 9 units. At this point, you
would start again.
Looking for short streaks is the best way to exploit the Field wager for extremely
low-rollers. But if you are already in the medium roller league and
can afford to play the game of craps for table minimums, then the Field is just
another sucker bet, even though you are betting so many numbers and they seemingly
hit so many times. The Field's moneymaking potential is an illusion to be sure.
Frank Scoblete
|
| |
|
| |
|
